<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Firefox 2.0.0* extensions work in Firefox 3.0.2*</title>
	<link>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/</link>
	<description>web application development with popular technologies</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-92162</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-92162</guid>
					<description>Hey Technographist - Yeah there's a noticeable difference in performance on heavily scripted sites with Firebug enabled - eg Gmail which has a javascript intensive core nowdays and it even happily warns you about Firebug.. "Firebug is known to make gmail slow unless configured correctly.."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Technographist - Yeah there&#8217;s a noticeable difference in performance on heavily scripted sites with Firebug enabled - eg Gmail which has a javascript intensive core nowdays and it even happily warns you about Firebug.. &#8220;Firebug is known to make gmail slow unless configured correctly..&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Get Firefox Add-Ons to Work With Firefox 3 Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-91889</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-91889</guid>
					<description>[...] That&#8217;s why a certain discussion on Mozilla&#8217;s forums makes us happy. Apparently there&#8217;s a way to force extensions to work with Firefox 3, beta or not. And it involves modifying the installation package of the extensions themselves. Take a look at the discussion here, or save time by reading a clear step-by-step here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That&#8217;s why a certain discussion on Mozilla&#8217;s forums makes us happy. Apparently there&#8217;s a way to force extensions to work with Firefox 3, beta or not. And it involves modifying the installation package of the extensions themselves. Take a look at the discussion here, or save time by reading a clear step-by-step here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Technographist</title>
		<link>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-91765</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-91765</guid>
					<description>FireBug has always had a tendency to screw up Firefox. I guess having to process lots of styling data does that to any browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FireBug has always had a tendency to screw up Firefox. I guess having to process lots of styling data does that to any browser.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-90537</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melbournechapter.net/wordpress/firefox/rich/2008/02/07/making-firefox-200-extensions-work-in-firefox-302/#comment-90537</guid>
					<description>FYI So far I've successfully installed and running the Web Developer and View Source Chart add-ons. I did however have some strange problem with Fire Bug...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI So far I&#8217;ve successfully installed and running the Web Developer and View Source Chart add-ons. I did however have some strange problem with Fire Bug&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
